NATCHEZ, Miss. – Pay raises for the mayor and aldermen are included in the budget draft they’re working to finalize next week for funding city government in the coming year.
Mayor Dan Gibson – who began his first term in 2020 with a $68,000 annual salary – said no decision by aldermen has been made yet to increase his pay. He noted it could be close to what other mayors make in similar-sized towns in the region.
For Natchez’ six aldermen, Gibson said the proposed budget calls for increasing their annual salaries by eight percent. They’re currently paid $22,300 a year.
“Looking back many, many, many years, we can’t even find when this Board of Aldermen has been allowed a raise,” Gibson said Thursday.
The mayor and aldermen – all reelected in June with little or no opposition – began their current term July 1. They held a public hearing Thursday to discuss the planned budget that totals $43 million for funding city government in the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1.
More money for the pay raises would be allocated while “still working within our budget balanced” without a general property tax increase, Gibson said.
While no final decision has been made yet, Gibson did say aldermen are looking at raising his salary to 5 percent above what City Clerk Megan McKenzie is paid. He noted pay raises for specific appointed city administrators are being considered by aldermen in discussions closed to the public.
In addition, $150,000 has been budgeted to raise wages for employees in the Natchez Public Works Department, which has been struggling to attract and retain workers because of low pay.
The proposed budget includes $1 million for repaving more Natchez streets. This adds to the $6 million allocated last year for putting new surfaces on more than 50 city streets.
Also being budgeted is money for the Canal Street bridge that needs to be stabilized as plans are underway for its eventual replacement. The $630,800 bridge project is coming from the city’s rainy day fund set aside for such unforeseen expenses, Gibson said last month.
Even with repairs, he said, the bridge could still be considered too frail for heavy vehicles. Long-term planning will be underway for funding and building a replacement bridge the mayor said could cost about $8 million and take three or more years to do.
Another major transportation project forthcoming is to enhance an area stretching from Devereaux Drive through downtown to the bluff overlooking the Mississippi River. While construction isn’t expected to start until 2027, much planning will take place in the coming year for spending a $24.5 million federal grant awarded to Natchez in June by the U.S. Department of Transportation.
Natchez aldermen in August selected the Neel-Schaeffer engineering firm for the preliminary work, such as doing environmental reviews, drafting designs and performing other tasks for the project aimed at improving pathways, landscapes, lighting, signage and other transit-related fixtures in Natchez.
Another project in the budget will renovate the city-owned historic Angelety House. With a $142,000 grant received from the state, repairs are being planned for the St. Catherine Street structure’s exterior, including its roof, gutters, windows and doors.
City officials acknowledged Thursday they didn’t adequately give the public sufficient notice about the budget hearing as required by law. A public notice must be published seven days before the hearing. It was actually posted Friday – six days prior to Thursday’s hearing.
While they’re “not in perfect compliance” with the law, said city attorney Jack Lazarus, the mayor and aldermen “complied with the spirit of the law” in notifying the public the budget hearing was taking place. Lazarus said he conferred with officials at the Mississippi Office of the State Auditor and the Mississippi Ethics Commission, which enforces the state’s open meetings law.
The Natchez Board of Aldermen is planning to adopt the budget next week prior to the Sept. 15 deadline required by state law before the fiscal year begins Oct. 1.
Actually, the alleged notice on Friday the 30th was published online, which was not in accordance with law since it has to be published in the paper. “The advertisement shall be no less than one-fourth (¼) page in size and the type used shall be no smaller than eighteen (18) point and surrounded by a one-fourth-inch solid black border. The advertisement may not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear.”
And, “The advertisement shall be run once each week for the two (2) weeks preceding the adoption of the final budget. The advertisement shall state that the taxing entity will meet on a certain day, time and place fixed in the advertisement, which shall be not less than seven (7) days after the day the first advertisement is published for the hearing.”
The first notice was published Saturday for the Sunday paper on September 1st and then 3 days later on Wednesday the 4th before the hearing on the 5th.
They scheduled September 12th for the day to adopt the budget on August 27th and the hearing for the 5th. Clearly, they messed up.
STATE LAWS – LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Mississippi laws require municipalities follow very specific budgetary procedures. These laws attach a wide range of conditions to the preparation and use of the municipality’s budget. The following law overview should help the reader to achieve a general understanding of legal requirements. For specific information on legal requirements, references to the related Mississippi Code Sections are provided. — Municipal Clerks Handbook
§ 27-39-203. Public hearings to consider budget and tax levies; form and content of advertisement of hearings.
(1) The governing body of all taxing entities shall hold a public hearing at which time the budget and tax levies for the upcoming fiscal year will be considered.
(2)
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the public hearing shall be advertised in accordance with the following procedures. The advertisement shall be no less than one-fourth (¼) page in size and the type used shall be no smaller than eighteen (18) point and surrounded by a one-fourth-inch solid black border. The advertisement may not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. It is the intent of the Legislature that the advertisement appears in a newspaper that is published at least five (5) days a week, unless the only newspaper in the county is published less than five (5) days a week. It is further the intent of the Legislature that the newspaper selected be one of general interest and readership in the community, and not one of limited subject matter. The advertisement shall be run once each week for the two (2) weeks preceding the adoption of the final budget. The advertisement shall state that the taxing entity will meet on a certain day, time and place fixed in the advertisement, which shall be not less than seven (7) days after the day the first advertisement is published, for the purpose of hearing comments regarding the proposed budget and proposed tax levies.
Reportedly, “Gibson currently makes $68,000. He said the new budget proposed setting the mayor’s salary at approximately 5 percent more than the city clerk’s salary. City Clerk Megan McKenzie currently makes $84,000 per year.”
This equals a raise of $20,200.00 from $68,000 per year to $88,200 which is 77% increase (20,200.00) in for his salary.
What I find amazing is the “pay increases will be funded through savings realized from the city’s recently negotiated new garbage contract. The budget also calls for replacing approximately four vehicles, “which are worse for wear, older and unreliable,” McKenzie said.”
How is this not a tax increase? Every household of Natchez is bound to pay for the “city’s recently negotiated new garbage contract” which is now being used to pay salaries at City Hall and new vehicles for the IT guy, the courier and the animal control at the police department.
From the meeting:
Alderwoman Irving: I just want to ask. The fleet, for what department was? Was it for public works or the police. The fleet, you said it was purchased….
City Clerk: “No, no, no. We just have several vehicles in our fleet, our current city fleet, that are very old, they’re very unreliable. Just old beat up vehicles that need to be.
“One of them is actually in IT [Information Technology], one of them is in inspections, we are looking for an additional vehicle within the police department for animal control, one for our courier who is currently borrowing an old vehicle from recreation because the vehicle he was driving no longer runs. And, trying to think, it was four or five of them I think that may be it.”
An 8% increase for the aldermen’s salaries equal $1,784.00 per 5 aldermen for a total $24,084.00 per year (Alderman Frazier’s salary is lower because he is collecting PERS from his service at the police department). This increase costs the city $120,424 more per year. The mayor’s salary increase of 77% equals or $20,200.00 costs the city $242,400.00 more per year. The grand total of these increases costs the city $362,824.00 per year. And this is supposed to be from the contract with Arrow for garbage collection?
For a reference,
§ 25-3-31. Salaries of elective state and district officers; employment of assistants. [Subsection (2) repealed effective July 1, 2024]
(1) The annual salaries of the following elected state and district officers are fixed as follows:
Governor $122,160.00
Attorney General 108,960.00
Secretary of State 90,000.00
Commissioner of Insurance 90,000.00
State Treasurer 90,000.00
State Auditor of Public Accounts 90,000.00
Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce 90,000.00
Transportation Commissioners 78,000.00